Comparison
From meeting analytics to active AI facilitation
| Feature | Read.ai | VoxeNova |
|---|---|---|
| Transcription & summaries | ✓ | ✓ |
| Meeting analytics | ✓ Engagement / sentiment | ✗ |
| Active facilitation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Speaks & asks clarifying questions in-meeting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Real-time diagrams | ✗ | ✓ |
| Decisions, requirements & risks as typed records | Summaries | ✓ Structured by meeting type |
| Knowledge graph | ✓ Personal, cross-app | ✓ Project, meeting-structured |
| Action item tracking | ✓ | ✓ With Jira sync |
| Data residency | Shared cloud | ✓ 5 regions incl. EU |
| Deployment | Shared cloud | ✓ Dedicated per-tenant server |
| Pricing | Free tier + per-user plans | $0 trial, $29/meeting PAYG, from $199/mo team |
Comparison based on publicly documented capabilities and may change as products evolve. Read.ai is a trademark of its respective owner.
Read.ai measures engagement and summarises after the call. VoxeNova joins the conversation, keeps it on agenda, and asks the clarifying questions that get decisions made.
Decisions, requirements, and risks come out as typed, queryable records organised by meeting type — not free-text recaps you have to re-read.
VoxeNova draws architecture and process diagrams live during the discussion, and can run on a dedicated single-tenant instance in your chosen region, including the EU.